方圆30公里仅27人 探访内蒙古首个戍边夫妻警务室******
(新春走基层)方圆30公里仅27人 探访内蒙古首个戍边夫妻警务室
中新网阿拉善1月17日电 题：方圆30公里仅27人 探访内蒙古首个戍边夫妻警务室
中新网记者张林虎
“都得收拾干净了，新年要有新气象。现在我们守边的条件越来越好，商店、卫生室、图书室、快递投放点，应有尽有，新的一年一定会更好。”李文娜一边收拾“职工小家”一边说。
兔年将至，内蒙古自治区首个戍边夫妻警务室民警徐乃超和妻子李文娜早早起床，“90后”夫妻俩将警务室和“职工小家”打扫得干干净净，用特有方式送上新年祝福。
图为内蒙古首个戍边夫妻警务室举行升旗仪式。 阿拉善盟公安局供图2022年年初，为了稳边固防，阿拉善边境管理支队决定在边境前沿建设抵边警务室，徐乃超得知情况后，主动申请前往一线，这也得到妻子李文娜的支持。
事实上，从警14年，除去去非洲利比里亚维和的一年，徐乃超一直在荒原戈壁摸爬滚打，行走在守边戍边和堡垒户之间。他与李文娜从恋爱到结婚，在一起的时间加起来不超2个月。
作为一名辅警，以及一名移民管理警察警嫂，李文娜承担着工作和生活的重任，也承受着与丈夫的长期分离。“他要去茫茫戈壁屯垦戍边，我们见面机会更少了，索性就决定跟他一起去。”
图为徐乃超和李文娜。 阿拉善盟公安局供图一片天，一条路，五间砖房支口锅，两人一狗一台车。就这样，内蒙古首个戍边夫妻警务室正式成立。
警务室驻扎在阿拉善左旗银根苏木查汉扎德盖嘎查，周边交通信息闭塞，大漠戈壁纵横，气候环境异常恶劣，人烟稀少。
初来乍到的徐乃超夫妇需要对3145平方公里的边境管理区、103公里的边境线踏查走访，熟悉管辖区里的一切事务，担负着治安维稳和边境管理工作任务。
“这里生产生活极度不便，我们吃水需要到15公里之外拉，警务室方圆30公里，仅有8户27人。”徐乃超说。
图为夫妻俩打扫“职工小家”。 阿拉善盟公安局供图为更好地服务农牧民，阿拉善边境管理支队在戍边夫妻警务室成立了“职工小家”，成为联系边境地区干部职工、开展帮扶服务的前沿阵地。
“职工小家”位于中蒙边境线附近，是内蒙古距离边境线最近的“职工小家”。
浇树、喂羊、剪驼绒……“职工小家”成立后，徐乃超、李文娜开始开展帮扶服务。经过朝夕相处，夫妻俩很快掌握了当地的基本情况，完成了从“外来客”到“贴心人”的角色转变。
图为夫妻俩打扫“职工小家”。 阿拉善盟公安局供图“额吉，这是我从旗里给您带的药，记得按时吃。”
“叔，剪羊绒人手不够，您就说。”
……
年逾古稀的敖云高娃患有慢性疾病，李文娜就用医学知识为老人义务辅助理疗；牧民巴图孟和家中人手不够，夫妻俩就与他结成帮扶对子，定期上门开展义务劳动。
由于生活不便，夫妻俩又先后又申请建成党员E站、救助站、商店、快递点等。
“这里配备了图书、医疗器材、生活物资，成了农牧民的集结站。”李文娜说。
在牧民眼里，“职工小家”已经成为他们眼中的第二个家，一个处处体现温馨、凝聚民心的温暖小家。“这里就是我们牧民的娘家，有啥急事难事，首先就要来这里寻求帮助。”牧民恩图格日勒和乌仁说。
“我今天巡查了23公里边境线，一切正常。”
“徐警官，边境线附近有一辆外地车辆，你快过来。”
……
“其实，我们是和牧民们一起在守边疆。”徐乃超说，农牧民在收获民警夫妻关心关爱的同时，也在尽心尽力地帮助守护边境安宁。
戍边期间，夫妻俩每天都体会着戍边工作的乐趣和充实，他们还救助了一只腿有残疾的大型贵宾犬，取名“李富贵”，成为生活中的陪伴。
在徐乃超和李文娜看来，边境的安宁，牧民的需要，就是他们坚守的动力。
新的一年，徐乃超、李文娜夫妻二人依然行走在祖国的边境线上，用心守护安宁，用爱诠释责任，在维护边境稳固的同时，也收获着幸福、赞誉和感动。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
